
Johann Eyfells
Cloth, Paper & Rubber
United Nations Exhibit
Flat as Flat
La Prima Generazione
The Bronze Exhibit
Cloth Collapsions
Paper Collapsions
Beyond Atavism
Receptualism
Reviews
Inquiries
|
Johann
Eyfells, Circular, Triangular and Cubical Linguisticities,
Aluminium
|
Since
we are resolutely claiming that the mode of being of the "new" quarry
of our quest cannot possibly be composed of transcendent "essences"
or forms, but exists in fact entirely as an operational phenomenon,
we are indeed concluding that the object of our query, an attempt
to elucidate an imagined "ultimate", foundational and generative "source",
is expressive of an UNSTOPPABLE AND CONCRETE SOMETHING that cannot
become an element of thought-formulation within our habitual and "natural"
forms of knowledge without, at least momentarily, thinking away this
habitual knowledge itself. |
|
The
thrust of the key notion of our investigative quest, the "whence
something?", might gain a new momentum and fresh penetrative intensity
by our coining and employing the all-inclusive new noun"WHITHERICITY",
a self-questioning term expressive of a "pure" phenomenon where
"history" becomes not a "being" but a "birth" - an unending
coming forth of pure difference and the unstoppable repetition of
the "being" of this difference itself. In brief, "our births" do
not have a terminal state, and one can view the above obversionary,
radically transmutational and ubiquitous realm, "whithericity",
as representing an "undetectable", but latent, "womb" or a "place"
where irrational self-similarities and "force recipes" are
necessarily born and re-born.
The
concluding sentence in the paragraph above, contains two underlined
words whose consequential significances are far from being
self-explanatory. Also, at a first glance, these terms seem to suffer
from an "up-in-the-air" arbitrariness - the first one implying a
sort of a senseless limbo, and the latter seems to dictate the negation
of any and all alternatives. But when their consequential intents
are conjoined in a phrase like "irrational necessity", then these
words convey an extraordinary sense of truly positive activity,
they now depict a reality pervaded by entirely formative and generative
powers where "SOMETHING" must always happen rather than "NOTHING".
The dual term, irrational necessity, is a verbal compound that only
signifies a seemingly groundless self-necessitating and irreducible
positivity and in that way offers us a reassuring base for the supposition
that our "whithericity" can indeed be "imagined" as a source of
perpetual force relations, a "source" that "exists" as a perennially
undone, unbounded, centerless and irreducible region of ubiquity,
a "source" where there is always admittedly "groundless" and "unnameable
source" attains meaningfulness only in the sense of being the latent
content of our "pure force recipes" and their consequential and
inseparable "co-functions" and phenomena.
|
continue
|